Rep. Cory Mills introduced the “DON-ument Act,” a bill to designate the southern border wall as a national monument, locking Trump’s project into federal protection.
At a Glance
- Rep. Cory Mills (R-Fla.) filed the “DON-ument Act” to protect the border wall.
- The bill would designate the wall across four border states as a national monument.
- Mills called the effort a tribute to Trump’s “America First” policies.
- The bill follows a string of Trump-flattery measures by House Republicans.
- Mills faces separate allegations of harassment, which he denies.
The Bill’s Intent
Mills introduced the measure Wednesday with the stated goal of preventing alteration of the southern border wall. His bill would apply to segments across California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas.
The legislation creates the Southern Border Wall National Monument, described as a safeguard against changes to Trump’s signature project. Mills framed the effort as an act of preservation tied directly to national sovereignty.
Watch now: The Hill’s Headlines — September 11, 2025
A Trump Tribute
Mills presented the bill as more than infrastructure. He compared the wall to the Statue of Liberty and Fort McHenry, sites tied to America’s founding spirit. He cast the proposal as proof of commitment to “America First” doctrine.
The measure fits a trend in the GOP conference. This year saw bills proposing to add Trump to Mount Rushmore, rename Dulles Airport, and even print his portrait on new currency. None advanced beyond symbolic signaling, but each kept Trump in the spotlight.
Political Backdrop
Mills’s push arrives as he faces personal scandal. A former girlfriend accused him of harassment and threats to leak intimate photos. Mills has denied all charges.
Critics argue that the bill is more stunt than substance, designed to please Trump loyalists rather than tackle pressing policy. Democrats point to border security challenges that remain unresolved, questioning the use of legislative time for symbolic fights.
What It Could Mean
If enacted, the bill would add layers of protection that complicate future removals or modifications. National monument status carries strict limits, requiring federal oversight and likely new maintenance budgets.
Supporters frame the wall as a lasting defense against illegal crossings. Opponents see its preservation as glorifying division and raising costs for little practical gain. The proposal now enters a chamber already divided over Trump’s legacy and the nation’s direction on immigration.
