
Trump’s creation of the Religious Liberty Commission marks an aggressive return to faith-based governance, aimed at shielding religious Americans from mounting institutional pushback.
At a Glance
- Trump signs Executive Order forming Religious Liberty Commission
- Commission tasked with protecting First Amendment faith rights
- Focus on attacks against worship, healthcare conscience protections
- Created during National Day of Prayer ceremony
New Faith Front in Washington
In a sweeping move to restore religious freedom to the national spotlight, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order establishing the Religious Liberty Commission. The action coincided with the National Day of Prayer and is seen by supporters as one of the most forceful defenses of religious rights in modern U.S. history.
The Commission is designed to protect Americans’ First Amendment rights, particularly in an era where religious expression is increasingly challenged in public institutions, healthcare, and finance. With rising incidents such as church vandalism and bank account closures for religious entities, the new body aims to provide a government-backed shield for faith communities.
Watch a report: Trump Establishes Religious Liberty Commission.
Though critics fear it blurs church-state lines, Trump defenders—such as author Eric Metaxas—argue that these fears are rooted in misinterpretations of the Constitution. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” Metaxas reminds detractors, echoing the Founding Fathers rather than modern media narratives.
Commission Mandate and Structure
The Commission will include up to 14 members, personally appointed by the President, and operate in coordination with the White House Faith Office. Members will serve voluntarily, underscoring a mission rooted in conviction rather than compensation.
The group’s remit includes addressing conscience rights in healthcare, protecting worship spaces, and pushing back against anti-religious financial discrimination. Regular reports will be submitted to advise the administration on areas where faith is under fire—guiding executive policy on matters of religious expression.
“Our liberties come from God, not government,” Metaxas stated, reinforcing the foundational view behind the Commission. Supporters view the initiative as a necessary countermeasure against rising cultural hostility toward religion, particularly Christianity, in American public life.
Critics Push Back—But Momentum Builds
Secular advocacy groups and media outlets like Politico have warned that the Commission may erode church-state boundaries. Yet Trump and allies remain undeterred. “Freedom,” Ronald Reagan once said, “is never more than one generation away from extinction”—a quote Trump echoed in defending the Commission’s urgency.
Set to expire on July 4, 2026, unless renewed, the Commission is already drawing support from a broad network of pastors, religious legal experts, and conservative commentators. They see the initiative not just as a policy tool, but as a cultural statement: that religious Americans will no longer be sidelined or silenced.
Whether this effort reshapes the national debate or merely adds to the growing polarization remains to be seen. But for millions of faith-driven Americans, the message is clear—Washington is finally listening.